Who doesn’t enjoy getting new clothing, especially when what we’re wearing is showing its age? C.S. Lewis could hardly be accused of a passion for keeping up with the latest fashions, but he was grateful to be adequately clothed when engaged in public endeavors.
A man of simple tastes, in 1953 he wrote an American correspondent about not attending Queen Elizabeth’s coronation. The reasons he offers are revealing.
You are quite right, I didn’t go to the Coronation. I approve of all that sort of thing immensely and I was deeply moved by all I heard of it; but I’m not a man for crowds and Best Clothes.
I was surprised by a discovery in a long-stored box of clothing that contained five pairs of pants in near mint condition. They were none the worse for their lengthy preservation. And I would be wearing them right now if they still fit. (The length matches my current legs; the waist, not so much.)
Oh, there is one other problem. They are corduroy. Extremely popular, when they were purchased. Less so now, although I understand “the comfy fabric has made a comeback in recent years, especially with the rise of thrifting, since corduroy is an incredibly durable fabric that is a common find in vintage shops.”
Returning to C.S. Lewis, we see he didn’t possess the embarrassing surplus of clothing most of us take for granted. In fact during WWII (1939-45) and its aftermath, Europeans suffered great deprivation. Britain’s recovery from the Second World War took some time, and the Lewis’ weathered the hardships with the assistance of friends in the United States.
Because of C.S. Lewis’ generosity, the gifts Americans periodically sent to him were shared with many beyond his own household. Although clothes rationing had formally ended in 1949, food continued to be rationed five more years, until 1954.
Edward Allen was one of Lewis’ benefactors. He began sending personal support parcels in 1948. As the following letter from Lewis shows, these included clothes as well as food items.
That perfection of packing, parcel no. 184 has just arrived, and I have spent a pleasant ten minutes dismembering it. Normally we won’t open your parcels when we get them, but reserve them for that moment of domestic crisis which so constantly arrives—“We shall have to open one of Edward Allen’s parcels” we say. But I tackled this one at once on account of the clothes.
The suit is just the thing I want for the summer, if there should happen to be a summer, which at the moment looks unlikely. (My brother skillfully annexed the last one you sent, and is still wearing it: on the strength of which he had the impudence to recommend this one to me)!
Once normalcy had returned to Britain, Lewis went to great effort to discourage continued generosity of this type. In 1956 he wrote another regular American friend after receiving an unsolicited Christmas present.
A thousand thanks. But look: you must stop. We never send any one any presents, so why should we get any. Our real name is Scrooge.
In truth, C.S. Lewis’ generosity abounded. In Mere Christianity he discusses the question of how generous Christians should be. I most strongly commend this principle to everyone wondering how they should arrange their own finances.
I do not believe one can settle how much we ought to give. I am afraid the only safe rule is to give more than we can spare. In other words, if our expenditure on comforts, luxuries, amusements, etc, is up to the standard common among those with the same income as our own, we are probably giving away too little.
If our charities do not at all pinch or hamper us, I should say they are too small. There ought to be things we should like to do and cannot do because our charitable expenditure excludes them.
For more about Lewis’ personal generosity, read “The Generous Heart and Life of C.S. Lewis.” The author points out, “as Lewis’s books became popular, large royalties poured in. Rather than upgrade his lifestyle, Lewis decided to maintain his current standard of living and give the rest away.”
As I mentioned above, C.S. Lewis also shared the contents of the post-war parcels he received. Presumably this extended to elements of clothing, as well. No doubt though, if he had received a fine corduroy suit, even the “endlessly generosity” of C.S. Lewis would have been stretched to its limits.
15 thoughts on “C.S. Lewis, Clothes & Charity”
Enjoyable and valuable insight. 👍
Glad you found something here worth the reading, Ken.
What a generous, humble heart our brother Lewis had, perhaps even exceeding his intellect! Whether he was on the receiving or giving end, he seemed always conscious of Whose gifts he was stewarding. Your posts always make plain that whether in private or public, Lewis lived his life coram Deo.
He certainly did, Dora. It’s good to be reminded of the meaning of life well lived.
When friends and acquaintances do “fun” things that I wish we could afford, living by the principal Lewis describes in Mere Christianity armors me against the sin of envy.
I’m in no way like C.S. Lewis, but it seems we have the same sense of fashion! Very interesting post.
I like going for comfort. Nothing like a warm robe/overcoat on a cold damp winter day…
I assume I’m not your only reader to now wish a picture of your wearing these mint-condition pants…
If only I could wear them, Chel. They were oh so comfortable…
Glad I could make you smile!
It’s the real man in the clothes, right?, not the clothes on the man. Jesus puts a new man in a suit, not just a suit on a man.
Just as you say, Gary. It’s not the exterior incidentals that really matter… but what’s inside, the true essence of a person.
We get all new everything in eternity and not worry about keeping up with trends.
Indeed, our Lord will make all things new.
Pingback: C.S. Lewis on Russian Aggression￼ « Mere Inkling Press